-
Presentation
Presentation
Teoria 3.1 (Theory of Architecture) belongs to the field of architectural theory and criticism, focusing on the period between the early 1960s and the present. The unit works on the formation of the architecture student's critical thinking: the capacity to read a theoretical text as an argument and to identify the presuppositions of a position. It is a course unit on the analysis of discourses and methods. It addresses the critical reading of primary sources, the methods of analysis of the built territory, particularly those developed for reading a real urban area, and the forms of critical discourse beyond the text - the architecture exhibition, documentary film and analytical drawing as instruments of argument.
-
Class from course
Class from course
-
Degree | Semesters | ECTS
Degree | Semesters | ECTS
Bachelor; Master Degree | Semestral | 4
-
Year | Nature | Language
Year | Nature | Language
3 | Mandatory | Português
-
Code
Code
ULP286-16159
-
Prerequisites and corequisites
Prerequisites and corequisites
Not applicable
-
Professional Internship
Professional Internship
Não
-
Syllabus
Syllabus
Topic 1 - From the collective house to the single house. Topic 2 - Critical regionalism and the construction of a canon. Topic 3 - The vernacular and its modes of representation. Topic 4 - Genealogy of domestic space Topic 5 - The norm: Modulor, Neufert and non-normativity. Topic 6 - Gender and space. Topic 7 - Ageing, accessibility and the house across a lifetime.
-
Objectives
Objectives
Identify and historically contextualise the main texts, authors, and critical positions produced between 1961 and 2000. Precisely define the operative concepts introduced by these texts - urban diversity, type, urban fact, permanence, duck and decorated shed, double coding, served space - and distinguish their respective fields of application. Critically read a primary source, situating it within the debate to which it responds. Translate a theoretical concept into an operative question applicable to a design decision. Construct and publicly defend a well-founded argument, responding to objections and revising one's position when the evidence warrants it. Work collaboratively to produce a shared outcome, negotiating common criteria for method and representation. Use sources ethically, transparently, and critically, including those generated by GenAI systems, while taking responsibility for the accuracy of the material presented.
-
Teaching methodologies
Teaching methodologies
All contact hours of this UC are devoted to theoretical teaching. The methodologies described are implemented through lectures, guided discussion, and seminar sessions. The exercises are carried out as autonomous student work within the allocated hours. a) Expository sessions conclude with a synthesis that translates the content into an operative question addressed to the ongoing work in the Design Studio CU. b) Study visits are coordinated across the different teaching activities. c) In the EG sessions, discussion will require each group to consider divergent positions, with assessment focusing on the quality of the argumentation and the ability to respond to objections. d) Study visits constitute expository sessions conducted outside the university premises, with commentary guided by the lecturer. e) Critical GenAI literacy. f) Moodle platform for the provision of primary texts, reading guides, briefs and assessment feedback, following an inverted classroom approach.
-
References
References
Barata Fernandes, F. (1999). Transformação e permanência na habitação portuense: As formas da casa na forma da cidade (2.ª ed.). Porto: FAUP Publicações. Eggener, K. L. (2002). Placing resistance: A critique of critical regionalism. Journal of Architectural Education, 55(4), 228-237. Evans, R. (1997). Figures, doors and passages. In Translations from drawing to building (pp. 55-91). London: AA Publications. (Trabalho original publicado em 1978) Frampton, K. (1983). Towards a critical regionalism: Six points for an architecture of resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture. Port Townsend: Bay Press. Rudofsky, B. (1964). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art. Sindicato Nacional dos Arquitectos (1961). Arquitectura popular em Portugal. Lisboa: SNA.
-
Assessment
Assessment
A avaliação é contínua e distribuída, sem exame final. A aprovação exige classificação final igual ou superior a 10 valores e presença mínima nas sessões de apresentação e nas visitas de estudo, nos termos do regulamento em vigor
Descrição
Tipo
Ponderação
F1 - Relatório da visita de estudo
Individual
5%
EG1 - Exercício de Grupo "Regionalismo Crítico"
Grupo
15%
F2 - Ficha "Rudofsky e Inquérito"
Individual
5%
EI1 - Exercício Individual "Regionalismo Crítico"
Individual
10%
F3 - Ficha "Normas"
Individual
5%
F4 - Ficha "Acessibilidade"
Individual
5%
EI2 - Exercício Domesticidade
Individual
25%
EI3 - Ensaio, reflexão sobre projeto
Individual
20%
Caderno da UC
Individual
10%
Total
100%
Critérios transversais de classificação. Rigor na leitura e no uso das fontes, incluindo verificação e correta referenciação; capacidade de construir e sustentar um argumento; qualidade e pertinência do material gráfico produzido em trabalho autónomo; e capacidade de responder à objeção em contexto de discussão pública.
Acompanhamento. Atendimento semanal por marcação. Devolução comentada de todos os elementos de avaliação, com apresentação sumária dos resultados em aula na semana seguinte à entrega.
Trabalhos escritos. Todos os elementos escritos seguem referenciação APA e incluem declaração de utilização de IAGen, nos termos do ponto seguinte.
-
Mobility
Mobility
No





