filmeu

Class Criminal Psychology and Punitive Severity

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    This course unit builds upon the learning acquired in the Legal and Forensic Psychology and Criminal Neuropsychology units, aiming to equip students with theoretical and practical knowledge regarding the intersection of Criminology and psycho-criminal expertise-specifically concerning the delinquent individual-while also developing their competencies for work within the judicial system and other relevant sectors (police, prisons, social reintegration), thereby encompassing the dimension of actual penal severity.  
  • Code

    Code

    ULHT6358-23391
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    Historical-epistemological framework. Conceptualization, object and methods. Relationship of Criminal Psychology with Criminal Law and Criminology. Psychological acceptance of crime. The decoding function of transgressive behaviors that belongs to Criminal Psychology. Criminal Profiling: notion; operationalization; practical applications. Criminality and psychological approach: characters of the penalty. Criminal Psychology and the subject's radioscopic view. Crime and exclusion: two ways? Psychological autopsy: notion, legal framework and method. Psychological approach to crime. Joint attributions of criminologists and criminal psychologists in the judicial context: complementarity. Punitive severity: notion, object and scope. Articulation with the psychologization of decisions. Severity assessment: instruments and method of work. Application of instruments: adult and young populations. Severity and social stratification; genre
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    This CU aims to provide information on the psychological knowledge applicable to the criminal phenomenon, highlighting its protagonists, their behaviors and settings where they happen; constituting Criminal Psychology as a reading grid for criminal behaviors, Criminology students need to have training in this area, learning concepts and understanding when cooperation with criminal psychologists is essential. The issue of punitive severity is, moreover, framed in the psychocriminal context, also emerging from Penal Law thinking and allowing students to know its dimension in depth. When populism is polluting public opinion about penal rationality, it is up to science to provide objective and scientifically supported answers
  • Teaching methodologies

    Teaching methodologies

    The course will combine the lecture method-primarily in theoretical classes-with the presentation of real-life cases in practical sessions, encouraging student debate. Leveraging existing protocols and informal agreements, study visits will be organized to criminal courts (under an agreement with the Lisbon Judicial District Court), as well as to educational centers and commissions for the protection of children and young people-with whom there is a twenty-year history of collaboration-and to the Bar Association, the Centre for Judicial Studies, and law firms with which ULHT maintains cooperation agreements. Emphasis will be placed on oral communication. Assessment will be based on attendance and participation in sessions designated by the instructors-including answering a question regarding the activity during the subsequent class (40%)-and on a written test (60%).
  • References

    References

    Béal, C., & Delia, L.(2017). Punir a-t-il un sens? R. Decartes 2017/3 (nº 93), 1-7. Davis, G. & Beech, A. (2012). Forensic Psychology. Leicester: BPS Textbooks. Dubé, R., & Garcia, M. (2018). L´opinion publique au fondement du droit de punir:Fragments d'une nouvelle théorie de la peine? Déviance et Société, vol. 42, 243-275. Durrant, R. (2013). An Introduction to Criminal Psychology. NY: Routledge. Gavin, H. (2014). Criminological and Forensic Psychology. London: SAGE. Hollin, C. (2013). Psychology and Crime: An Introduction to Criminological Psychology. NY: Routledge.  
  • Assessment

    Assessment

    Descrição dos instrumentos de avaliação (individuais e de grupo) ¿ testes, trabalhos práticos, relatórios, projetos... respetivas datas de entrega/apresentação... e ponderação na nota final.

    Exemplo:

    Descrição

    Data limite

    Ponderação

    Teste de avaliação

    dd-mm-yyyy

    30%

    Portfolio

    dd-mm-yyyy

    40%

    (...)

     

     

     

    Adicionalmente poderão ser incluídas informações gerais, como por exemplo, referência ao tipo de acompanhamento a prestar ao estudante na realização dos trabalhos; referências bibliográficas e websites úteis; indicações para a redação de trabalho escrito...

     

SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios entidade signataria