-
Presentation
Presentation
This course unit builds upon the learning acquired in the Legal and Forensic Psychology and Criminal Neuropsychology units, aiming to equip students with theoretical and practical knowledge regarding the intersection of Criminology and psycho-criminal expertise-specifically concerning the delinquent individual-while also developing their competencies for work within the judicial system and other relevant sectors (police, prisons, social reintegration), thereby encompassing the dimension of actual penal severity.
-
Class from course
Class from course
-
Degree | Semesters | ECTS
Degree | Semesters | ECTS
Bachelor | Semestral | 5
-
Year | Nature | Language
Year | Nature | Language
3 | Mandatory | Português
-
Code
Code
ULHT6358-23391
-
Prerequisites and corequisites
Prerequisites and corequisites
Not applicable
-
Professional Internship
Professional Internship
Não
-
Syllabus
Syllabus
Historical-epistemological framework. Conceptualization, object and methods. Relationship of Criminal Psychology with Criminal Law and Criminology. Psychological acceptance of crime. The decoding function of transgressive behaviors that belongs to Criminal Psychology. Criminal Profiling: notion; operationalization; practical applications. Criminality and psychological approach: characters of the penalty. Criminal Psychology and the subject's radioscopic view. Crime and exclusion: two ways? Psychological autopsy: notion, legal framework and method. Psychological approach to crime. Joint attributions of criminologists and criminal psychologists in the judicial context: complementarity. Punitive severity: notion, object and scope. Articulation with the psychologization of decisions. Severity assessment: instruments and method of work. Application of instruments: adult and young populations. Severity and social stratification; genre
-
Objectives
Objectives
This CU aims to provide information on the psychological knowledge applicable to the criminal phenomenon, highlighting its protagonists, their behaviors and settings where they happen; constituting Criminal Psychology as a reading grid for criminal behaviors, Criminology students need to have training in this area, learning concepts and understanding when cooperation with criminal psychologists is essential. The issue of punitive severity is, moreover, framed in the psychocriminal context, also emerging from Penal Law thinking and allowing students to know its dimension in depth. When populism is polluting public opinion about penal rationality, it is up to science to provide objective and scientifically supported answers
-
Teaching methodologies
Teaching methodologies
The course will combine the lecture method-primarily in theoretical classes-with the presentation of real-life cases in practical sessions, encouraging student debate. Leveraging existing protocols and informal agreements, study visits will be organized to criminal courts (under an agreement with the Lisbon Judicial District Court), as well as to educational centers and commissions for the protection of children and young people-with whom there is a twenty-year history of collaboration-and to the Bar Association, the Centre for Judicial Studies, and law firms with which ULHT maintains cooperation agreements. Emphasis will be placed on oral communication. Assessment will be based on attendance and participation in sessions designated by the instructors-including answering a question regarding the activity during the subsequent class (40%)-and on a written test (60%).
-
References
References
Béal, C., & Delia, L.(2017). Punir a-t-il un sens? R. Decartes 2017/3 (nº 93), 1-7. Davis, G. & Beech, A. (2012). Forensic Psychology. Leicester: BPS Textbooks. Dubé, R., & Garcia, M. (2018). L´opinion publique au fondement du droit de punir:Fragments d'une nouvelle théorie de la peine? Déviance et Société, vol. 42, 243-275. Durrant, R. (2013). An Introduction to Criminal Psychology. NY: Routledge. Gavin, H. (2014). Criminological and Forensic Psychology. London: SAGE. Hollin, C. (2013). Psychology and Crime: An Introduction to Criminological Psychology. NY: Routledge.
-
Assessment
Assessment
Descrição dos instrumentos de avaliação (individuais e de grupo) ¿ testes, trabalhos práticos, relatórios, projetos... respetivas datas de entrega/apresentação... e ponderação na nota final.
Exemplo:
Descrição
Data limite
Ponderação
Teste de avaliação
dd-mm-yyyy
30%
Portfolio
dd-mm-yyyy
40%
(...)
Adicionalmente poderão ser incluídas informações gerais, como por exemplo, referência ao tipo de acompanhamento a prestar ao estudante na realização dos trabalhos; referências bibliográficas e websites úteis; indicações para a redação de trabalho escrito...
-
Mobility
Mobility
No





