filmeu

Class Risk Assessment and Management

  • Code

    Code

    ULP7021-26485
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    Fundamental concepts. Risk conceptual model. Framework of the national territory: geological, geomorphological and climatic. Analysis methodologies for drawing up susceptibility, hazard and risk maps for natural, mixed and technological risks. Multi-risk analysis. Risk matrices. The importance of risks for public policies and their presence in land management instruments. Legislation related to risk management and assessment.
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    Learning objectives to achieve by students: - Assimilate and use fundamental concepts related to risks. - Interpret the Conceptual Risk Model. - Framing risks in the context of public policies. - Identify the major national and international guidelines within the framework of risk management. - Valuing the role of Territorial Management Instruments in risk management; - Analyze the risks present in the territory. - Characterize and assess the hazards that can affect the exposed elements. - Present risk management solutions, appropriate to each situation. The teaching methods to be used, better described below, correspond to robust solutions perfectly adapted to the indicated learning objectives.
  • Teaching methodologies

    Teaching methodologies

    Teaching combines theoretical lectures supported by audiovisual materials with practical sessions focused on solving applied exercises, using real-life situations familiar to students. The approach emphasizes the connection between theory and practice, while addressing possible knowledge gaps to ensure a common foundation. Assessment aligns with this model, encouraging continuous engagement with the material and further research. Individual assignments promote deeper learning outside class. Tutorials provide personalized support and study guidance.
  • References

    References

    Birkmann, J. (Ed.) (2013). Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo. French, S. G. (2008). Risk Assessment, Modeling and Decision Support. Strategic Directions. Ed. Bostrom, A. Risk, Governance and Society, nº 14, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p. 332. Haining, R. (2004). Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 432p. Julião, R.P. et al. (2009). Guia metodológico para a produção de cartografia municipal de risco e para a criação de SIG de base municipal. ANPC, DGOTDU, IGP. Slovic, P. (2007). The perception of risk. Earthscan: London. UNISDR- United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2011) Zêzere, J.L.; Pereira, A.R.; Morgado, P. (2006). Perigos Naturais e Tecnológicos no Território de Portugal Continental, Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Lisboa.
  • Assessment

    Assessment

    A avaliação será de tipo contínuo, suportada em três elementos de avaliação: dois testes, cada um com peso de 30% para a calssificação final e um trabalho prático com peso de 40%. Em caso de reprovação em avaliação contínua, o estudante será admitido a um exame final global de época de recurso (100%), nos termos do Regulamento de avaliação de conhecimentos e competências da IES.

    Exemplo:

    Descrição

    Data limite

    Ponderação

    Teste de avaliação

    dd-mm-yyyy

    30%

    Portfolio

    dd-mm-yyyy

    40%

    (...)

     

     

     

    Adicionalmente poderão ser incluídas informações gerais, como por exemplo, referência ao tipo de acompanhamento a prestar ao estudante na realização dos trabalhos; referências bibliográficas e websites úteis; indicações para a redação de trabalho escrito...

     

SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios