filmeu

Class Artistic Project I

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    This course consists of theoretical classes (based on examples that support the definition, presentation, and rationale of the artistic project) and practical classes (held in a studio and tutoring format, dedicated to the development of the project, practical experimentation, and artistic development of each student, under the supervision of professors and in dialogue/debate with peers).  At the end of the semester, students must exhibit their artistic project and present a portfolio.
  • Code

    Code

    ULHT7008-26046
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    Lectures: Based on examples that support the definition, presentation and rationale of the artistic project, with emphasis on: 1) how to proceed with the thematic definition and formulation of a central question in a project in the field of Painting; 2) what are the differences in the theoretical and practical approaches necessary for the elaboration of a project taking into account the specificities of the artistic process and the different media in which it can be configured (Painting is conceived in the expanded field). Practical classes: Held in a studio and tutored, they are dedicated to the development of the artistic project. They focus on practical experimentation and the artistic improvement of each student, under the supervision of teachers and in dialogue/debate with colleagues. At the end of the semester, students must exhibit their artistic project and present a portfolio.  
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    General: Develop a project in Painting following the processes, strategies and methodologies inherent to Art-Based Research. The project can be developed throughout the master's programme, namely in its technical, theoretical and conceptual dimensions in a deep interdisciplinarity with the UCs of the study course. Understand the diversity of creative processes. Specifics: To develop the artistic and technical, theoretical and conceptual skills that are fundamental to the development of an artistic project Initiate a process of art-based research with a map of references and the deepening of each student's artistic individuality. Encourage (self-)reflective participation through critical, reflective and collective dialogues.
  • Teaching methodologies

    Teaching methodologies

    Teaching methodologies are based on two models: idea and portfolio presentation classes, led by students, concluded with collective critical discussions. Presentation classes are held at the beginning of the semester. Students share their portfolios and intentions for developing their artistic projects. The collective critical discussions at the end of these presentations develop discursive skills and curiosity about their peers' work in a spirit of reflection and dialogue, guided by respect. The SWAT analysis model should structure the discussion, allowing students to develop the ability to receive and provide feedback openly, opening up to cooperative learning and establishing the class as a learning community. These actions reinforce expected learning outcomes and pave the way for student autonomy. (See more detailed information in: Funcionamento da unidade curricular)
  • References

    References

    BOURGEOIS, L. (2015). Louise Bourgeois: The Spiders and the Tapestries. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. DUNINGAM, E. C. (2013). A Celebration Of Light: The Art Of James Turrel. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. ELGER, D. (2000). Donald Judd Colorist. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. ELGER, D. (2000). Gerhard Richter: Catalogue Raisonné. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. FICACCI, L. (2003). PIRANESI: Acqueforti/ Grabados/Águas-fortes. Cologne: Taschen. GOETZ, I., LENCSÉS, L., SCHOR, G., VINKEN, B. 82015). Cindy Sherman. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. JOICE, P. (1999). Hockney on Art: conversations with Paul Joice. London: Little brown. KABAKOV, I., KABAKOV, E. (2005). An Alternative History of Art: Rosenthal, Kabakoc, Spivak. Bielfeld: Kerber KABAKOV, I., KABAKOV, E. (2003). Where is our place? Milano: charta. KUSTER, U. , SHFF, R. (2015), Peter Doig. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz. SLAGER, H. (2015). The Pleasure Of Research. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz.  
  • Assessment

    Assessment

    A avaliação é contínua e presencial e têm dois momentos de avaliação periódica e um momento de avaliação final. Os estudantes podem requerer exame de recurso e exame de época especial. A avaliação contínua afere-se com a presença e a participação do estudante nos debates propostos em sala de aula, na capacidade de partilhar referências e de fomentar o pensamento crítico nas discussões de turma. Esta componente tem uma ponderação de 30% na nota final.

    Existem dois momentos de avaliação intercalar. No primeiro momento é requerido uma apresentação informal do que está a ser realizado pelo estudante no âmbito do seu projecto. Nesta fase esperam-se esboços de ideias, experiências plásticas, maquetas, o início de um mapeamento de referências bibliográficas e artísticas. Esta avaliação tem uma ponderação de 10%, uma vez que se dá num momento inicial do processo criativo.

    O segundo momento de avaliação intercalar tem uma ponderação de 20%. Nesta fase, o estudante apresenta um relatório visual e informativo que deve mostrar maior desenvolvimento do projeto artístico, seja pela quantidade de experimentações e eventualmente de obras que demonstrem uma maior assertividade em direção a um programa concreto de trabalho, seja pelo enriquecimento do mapa de referências bibliográficas, seja pelo trabalho plástico concretizado, seja pelo que está planeado continuar a desenvolver. Aferir a qualidade plástica e conceptual do projeto é o objetivo desta avaliação. As avaliações intercalares são expressas qualitativamente (Não Satisfaz - abaixo de 10 valores; Satisfaz - entre 10 e 14 valores; Bom - entre 15 e 18 valores; Muito Bom - entre 19 e 20 valores).

    A avaliação final dá-se no final das aulas com a apresentação de uma exposição dos trabalhos realizados e de um portefólio que se pode assumir como um ensaio de um catálogo dessa exposição. Esta avaliação tem uma ponderação de 40% na nota final, expressa numa pontuação de zero a vinte valores. O estudante que tenha faltado a uma das avaliações intercalares e aos momentos tutoriais pode não ser admitido à avaliação final.

    Caso o estudante não tenha uma nota positiva ou queira fazer melhoria da nota obtida em avaliação final pode recorrer ao exame de recurso. Este exame replica a avaliação final, mas para o seu sucesso, o estudante deve apresentar uma melhoria do seu trabalho. Para o estudante-trabalhador e finalistas há ainda o exame de época especial que acontece mais tarde relativamente ao exame de época de recurso.

     

    _____________________

     

    Educational assessment is continuous and face-to-face. There are two mid-term and one final assessment. Students can request an appeal exam and a special exam.
    Continuous assessment is based on students' attendance and participation in class debates, their ability to share references and foster critical thinking in class discussions. This component has a weighting of 30 per cent in the final grade.

    There are two mid-term assessments. The first requires an informal presentation of what the student is doing as part of their project. At this stage, sketches of ideas, graphic and material experiments, models and the beginnings of a mapping of bibliographical and artistic references are expected. This assessment is weighted at 10 per cent, as it takes place at an early stage in the creative process.
    The second mid-term assessment has a weighting of 20 per cent. In this phase, the student presents a visual and informative report that should show the development of the artistic project. This should be considered in terms of the number of experiments and possibly works that demonstrate greater assertiveness towards a specific work program, the enrichment of the map of bibliographical references, the artistic work that has been achieved and what is planned to be developed further. The aim of this evaluation is to assess the technical, visual and conceptual quality of the project. Intermediate assessments are expressed qualitatively (Not Satisfactory - below 10 values; Satisfactory - between 10 and 14 values; Good - between 15 and 18 values; Very Good - between 19 and 20 values).

    The final assessment takes place at the end of the semester with the presentation of an exhibition of the work done and a portfolio that can be seen as an essay for an exhibition catalog. This assessment has a weighting of 40 per cent in the final grade, expressed as a score from zero to twenty. Students who have missed one of the interim assessments or tutorials may not be admitted to the final assessment.
    If the student doesn't get a positive mark or wants to improve on the mark obtained in the final assessment, they can take an appeal exam. This exam replicates the final assessment, but for it to be successful, the student must show an improvement in their work.

    For working students and finalists, there is also a special period exam, which takes place later than the appeal period exam.

SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios