filmeu

Class Project II

  • Presentation

    Presentation

    This Course Unit is the last moment in which students confront their arguments with their supervising lecturers and finalise their project. The aim is to promote an in-depth discussion of the arguments on which each student focuses in the development of their project. The methodologies to be used, the critical review of the bibliographic material and the choice of study problems (theoretical and empirical) will be subject to critical review and final assessment, thus leading to a project outline. Students must be able to defend their work argumentatively and show the impact it may have on the national and international community.
  • Code

    Code

    ULP6062-512
  • Syllabus

    Syllabus

    1. Definition of problem, field, object, and application. 2. Comparison with the state of the art and similar works. 3. Project implementation. 4. Writing and finalisation 5. AI: from research assistance to academic integrity concerns.
  • Objectives

    Objectives

    This Course Unit is the last moment in which students confront their arguments with their supervising lecturers and finalise their project. The aim is to promote an in-depth discussion of the arguments on which each student focuses in the development of their project. The methodologies to be used, the critical review of the bibliographic material and the choice of study problems (theoretical and empirical) will be subject to critical review and final assessment, thus leading to a project outline. Students must be able to defend their work argumentatively and show the impact it may have on the national and international community.
  • References

    References

    Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: introduction to digital literacy. Wiley-Blackwell. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (Eleventh). Wiley. Lakatus, E. (1980). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers: Cambridge University Press. Macmillan. Foucault, M. (1969). L'Archeologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. Hart, C. (2007). Doing a Literature Review. Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: Sage Publications. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage. Rivard, S. (2020). Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft. Journal of Information Technology, 36(3), 316-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220911938 Rugg, G., & Petre, M. (2007). A Gentle Guide to Research Methods. Open University Press.
  • Assessment

    Assessment

    Avaliação da progressão dos trabalhos e da defesa do projeto 100%.

     

SINGLE REGISTRATION
Lisboa 2020 Portugal 2020 Small financiado eu 2024 prr 2024 republica portuguesa 2024 Logo UE Financed Provedor do Estudante Livro de reclamaões Elogios entidade signataria